July 10, 2018

DWAG Statement on the 27th ICC Prosecutors Report Regarding Darfur to the UN Security Council, and UNSC Members’ Responses


On Wednesday June 20th, Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court Fatou Bensouda briefed the United Nations Security Council regarding the progress of the ICC investigation of Darfur, pursuant to UNSCR 1593. She began her testimony with an admonishment of the international community that the people of Darfur have suffered so long and received so little justice. Noting that 13 years have passed since the case was referred to the ICC by the Security Council, Benouda remarked that all those indicted are still at large, and that conflict is still ongoing. The Prosecutor’s report also noted the recent fighting in Jebel Marra and acknowledged that 80,000 civilians have been displaced in recent months.

Specifically, Bensouda noted the lack of cooperation from the state parties to the Rome Statute in executing the arrest warrants against the perpetrators of genocide in Darfur. Sudanese President al-Bashir was indicted by the ICC in 2009, yet in 2018 alone has visited Jordan, Chad, Uganda, Ethiopia, Turkey, Egypt, Rwanda, and Saudi Arabia without arrest. Jordan, Chad, and Uganda are all three party to the Rome Statute and are therefore failing to uphold their legal obligation to the International Criminal Court.[1]

Several of the state delegates to the Security Council reinforced Madam Bensouda’s concerns and reminded the Council that the violence in Darfur is still ongoing. Madam Bensouda’s report noted particular concern with the safety of Internally Displaced Persons, that sexual violence is common around IDP camps, and that previously displaced persons are often targeted with sexual violence upon returning home. This is particularly concerning given President al-Bashir’s stated policy of closing the IDP camps in Darfur by the end of this year.

Following the Prosecutors address of the council, the state delegates of Council members made statements of their own in response.[2] Several of these responses were strong denunciations of the violence in Darfur and the Government of Sudan which commits it, as well as castigations of the Government of Sudan for its repeated refusal to cooperate with the ICC, UNAMID, and humanitarian organizations which attempt to operate in Darfur to provide services to the affected communities. These states noted especially the ongoing sexual violence prevalent in Darfur, especially carried out by Government forces, the rising level of arbitrary arrests throughout Sudan, and the importance of protecting IDPs. Among those speaking on behalf of the long-suffering people of Darfur were the delegates for the United Kingdom, France, the United States, Peru, Sweden, Bolivia, Poland, and the Netherlands. The United States strong statement regarding Sudanese accountability was noteworthy, and hopefully a harbinger of more responsible American policy towards Sudan, given the Trump administration’s removal of sanctions against Sudan in October 2017.

Several nations’ delegates instead replied to the Prosecutor’s briefing with hostility, lies, accusations, and coldly inhumane illogic. The delegates representing Ethiopia, China, Equatorial Guinea, Kazakhstan, Côte d’Ivoire, and Russia actually praised the Government of Sudan for it’s supposed efforts to achieve peace in Darfur. Such positions are of no surprise considering the human rights records of these governments themselves. The fundamental illogic of praising a genocidal regime for working towards peace was apparently lost on their delegates. These six states, as well as Kuwait and Equatorial Guinea, challenged the ICC jurisdiction and its right to indict a sitting head of state, attempting to discredit a powerful tool of the international justice, used by the international community in response to genocide.

The delegate from Sudan addressed the Council as well, repeating the same spin-doctoring and denials of fact which Sudan has published for years. He claimed that Sudan is a positive force in international relations throughout its geographic region, accused the prosecutor of a secret conspiracy against Sudan, denied that the international community had any right to prosecutor a sitting head of state, and that Sudan was being targeted as part of an international conspiracy against the legitimacy of African rulers. He failed to acknowledge that his government has perpetrated genocide against its own citizens.

To different degrees, many delegates acknowledged statements of fact regarding the level of conflict in Darfur which were at best misleading, and at worst patently false. First, several delegates applauded the government of Sudan for its role in diminishing the level of military conflict in Darfur. This presupposes two claims, (1) military conflict is declining in Darfur, and (2) the government of Sudan is playing a constructive role in making this be so. Second, multiple delegates again applauded the government of Sudan for improving humanitarian conditions on the ground in Sudan. We refute both claims based on available evidence of the reality on the ground in Darfur. This evidence is presented below.

Claim: Violent conflict is declining in Darfur, and this is tied to government progress.

Fact: This year continues a recent trend of escalated violence as compared to historical averages, and the government of Sudan is in fact conducting significantly more military activity this year than it historically has.

image (1)

Chart 1 presents data collected by ACLED[3] on armed confrontations by this time each year, over the length of the conflict in Darfur. When put in historical perspective, claims by UN delegates that military violence in Darfur is diminishing are clearly dramatically optimistic understatements of actual conditions. Yes, the 71 battles thus far in 2017 reflect a slight decline from the 77 battles by this time last year. And yes, this is again a decline from the peak of 151 battles by this time in 2016. But in historical context, these numbers still represent an extreme escalation of violence in Darfur in recent years. The peak of 151 battles in 2016 was a massive 200% rise from the previous peak of violence in 2005. The 71 battles thus far in 2018 still represent a 45% rise in violence over the previous peak in 2005.

image (2)

 

 

 

 

 

Not only is the general level of military activity unusually high, but the government share of that activity in 2018 actually represents an increase over recent averages. Chart 2 presents the percentage of all battles in Darfur which involved government forces.[4] Following a massive spike in government military action in 2002 and 2003, government involvement in battles in Darfur hovered around a relatively stable average of 60% since 2004. This year represents a statistically unusual high level of government military action, approaching the peak year of 2003. The government of Sudan has been involved in 86% of all battles thus far in 2018, which is greater than 1.5 standard deviations above the average for this time of the year since 2004.

Claim: The humanitarian Situation is improving in Darfur.

Fact: This year continued to reflect a generally diminished security environment for civilians in Darfur, as compared to historical averages over the length of the conflict.

image (3)

Several delegates made the claim that the humanitarian situation on the ground in Darfur is improving. This is an utter contradiction from the available data, so extreme as to constitute an outright lie. This year has indeed seen a decline in incidents of violence against civilians when compared to this time last year. However, much like the level of military action described above, this reflects a decline within the context of extremely high recent levels of violence. The 125 recorded incidents of violence against civilians thus far in 2018 is 29% above the pre-2013 average, and within 13% of the pre-2013 peak of 144 incidents in the first six months of 2004. To put this another way, if the same level of violence against civilians in 2018 occurred in 2013, it would be an unambiguous escalation of violence. It only seems like a decrease, and can be disingenuously presented as such, because it follows the 300% spike in violence against civilians which occurred between 2013 and 2015, as compared to the previous historical average. To claim that the humanitarian situation in Darfur is “improving” because the level of violence against civilians is returning to the unacceptably high pre-2013 level is a fundamentally malevolent distortion of reality.

The UN delegates are cherry-picking historical trends, representing a decline from a massive local maximum as a general decline in violence, even though this still represents a time of heightened violence over the historical peak.

While it is important to highlight actual conditions in Darfur, and especially to point out where such powerful policymakers such as delegates to the UNSC misstate fact, such nitpicking about numbers is actually beyond the point. What is universally acknowledged is that, at whatever level, the Government of Sudan is committed to war against its own civilians. The question is not truly the amount of violence, or the numbers of battles, per year but whether the government of Sudan can be allowed to commit one single act of state violence against its own people in the first place.

In addition to what was explicitly discussed during the briefing, several trends were not mentioned by remain crucial to understanding the context of the ICC’s investigation into the Government of Sudan’s conduct in Darfur. First, it should be noted that Government forces, and their associated militia, are nearly uniformly responsible for all acts of violence, and sexual violence specifically. The notion that Darfur is a warzone in which citizens are at risk from all sides is incorrect and perpetrated to fit the Government of Sudan’s international political agenda. Second, it should be stressed that violence against civilians, and again especially sexual violence, is being used for political purposes by the Government of Sudan. Attacks on civilians, including beatings, extrajudicial killings, and rapes, are often conducted in tandem with purely military activity, and this pattern has existed for the length of the conflict in Darfur since it began over 15 years ago. More detail on both of these points is available on the DWAG website at: http://www.darfurwomenaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Fact-vs-Fiction_Ongoing-Genocide-in-Darfur.pdf

[1] The text of the Prosecutors official report can be found at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocuments/20180620-27-rep-UNSCR-1593-ENG.pdf

[2] Full Summaries of these addresses can be found at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/sc13388.doc.htm, and the full transcript of the briefing at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.8290

[3] Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project

[4] Number of battles involving government forces divided by total number of battles in Darfur

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

DWAG Statement on the 27th ICC Prosecutors Report Regarding Darfur to the UN Security Council, and UNSC Members’ Responses

On Wednesday June 20th, Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court Fatou Bensouda briefed the United Nations Security Council regarding the progress of the ICC investigation of Darfur, pursuant to UNSCR 1593. She began her testimony with an admonishment of the international community that the people of Darfur have suffered so long and received so little […]


August 2, 2017

MOROCCO: ARREST SUDANESE PRESIDENT BASHIR

If Bashir enters Morocco, Moroccan authorities must respect their legal obligations to arrest and surrender Bashir to the International Criminal Court.


May 18, 2017

Bashir Watch calls on Saudi Arabia to arrest or rescind invitation to accused genocidaire

The Bashir Watch Coalition, a group of international law and human rights organizations dedicated to ending human rights violations and promoting accountability in Sudan, writes to express its concern that Saudi Arabia has invited Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir to the Islamic-American Summit that will discuss the dangers of extremism and terrorism and ways to spread the […]


April 4, 2017

ETHIOPIA WELCOMES LEADER ACCUSED OF GENOCIDE

BashirWatch calls on the Ethiopian authorities to arrest and transfer Bashir to the ICC to face the charges against him in a fair trial.


February 18, 2017

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: ARREST SUDANESE PRESIDENT BASHIR

If Bashir enters the UAE, Emirati authorities must respect their legal obligations to arrest and surrender Bashir to the International Criminal Court.


February 2, 2017

WANTED ON CHARGES OF GENOCIDE, JORDAN WELCOMES BASHIR

The government of Jordan welcomed Bashir, emboldening a leader of a regime that continues to bomb civilian areas and deny humanitarian aid.


November 26, 2016

BASHIRWATCH CALLS ON UNITED ARAB Emirates TO OBSERVE ITS LEGAL OBLIGATIONS AND ARREST PRESIDENT BASHIR

The United Arab Emirates welcomed Bashir, emboldening a leader of a regime that continues to bomb civilian areas and deny humanitarian aid.


November 24, 2016

ENABLING ATROCITIES: Equatorial Guinea WELCOMES OMAR AL-BASHIR

If Bashir enters Equatorial Guinea, authorities must respect their legal obligations to arrest and surrender Bashir to the International Criminal Court.


November 8, 2016

Ethiopia WELCOMES LEADER ACCUSED OF GENOCIDE

BashirWatch calls on the Ethiopian authorities to arrest and transfer Bashir to the ICC to face the charges against him in a fair trial.


November 7, 2016

Morocco: ARREST SUDANESE PRESIDENT BASHIR

If Bashir enters Morocco, Moroccan authorities must respect their legal obligations to arrest and surrender Bashir to the International Criminal Court.


The Case Against Bashir

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is the only sitting president with an outstanding arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court.

He stands accused of being the mastermind of the genocide in Darfur where Sudanese forces and government-sponsored militias carried out a campaign of attacks against innocent civilians.

On March 4, 2009 the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Bashir for 7 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes. On July 12, 2010 the ICC issued an additional warrant adding 3 counts of genocide for the ethnic cleansing of the Fur, Masalit, and Zaghawa tribes.

Undeterred by his arrest warrants, Bashir continues his reign of impunity—attacking innocent civilians in Darfur and other states in Sudan and travelling freely to other countries.

What Happened in Darfur?

This interactive timeline provides a history of the conflict.

Thank you for joining BashirWatch

Together, we will keep Bashir in our sights until the international community arrests him so that he will face justice. Build the international network tracking Bashir by sharing with your friends and family on Facebook, Twitter and email:

Facebook Share on Facebook Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is the only sitting head of state wanted for genocide. Join me in taking action to hold Bashir accountable for his crimes in Darfur. http://bashirwatch.org
Twitter Share on Twitter Don’t let Sudanese President Bashir get away with the #Darfur genocide. http://bit.ly/YnYsyr #bashirwatch

Copy/paste this into an email and send to your friends:

Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is the only sitting head of state indicted for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity for his crimes in Darfur.

Undeterred by his arrest warrants, Bashir continues his crimes with impunity, expanding his bombing and attacks against civilians beyond Darfur to those in the Sudanese states of Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan.

Join me in taking action to arrest Bashir. It is time for justice to be served.

Keep a watchful eye on Bashir by supporting BashirWatch with a donation. The people of Darfur and across Sudan are crying for justice. Your donation will allow us to keep Bashir under watch at all times and help us mobilize activists across the world to speak out whenever he is posed to travel.

Without justice, there cannot be freedom for the people of Darfur and all those persecuted in Sudan. Thank you for standing with them.

Join BashirWatch

Join our global rapid response network to protest governments who allow Bashir to visit. Whenever there are signs that Bashir is about to travel, we will target the country he is planning to travel to with emails, ads and creative actions to demand Bashir’s arrest.

First Name

Last Name

Country

Email

BashirWatch Privacy Policy

While we want the world to know where Omar al-Bashir is, we don't want the world to be watching you.

We will never sell, rent or share your personal information with a 3rd party, especially your email addresses and phone numbers, unless required by law. Never ever! Because we hate spam just as much as you do.

How do we use the information you provide?

BashirWatch uses the information we collect from you in an effort to engage you as an online activist. We will use your email address to send you periodic updates, actions you can take and for contributions. An option to unsubscribe will be in every email we send. While we won't get tired of watching Bashir, we respect your right to take a break.

Data tracking.

Some information other than personally identifiable information may automatically be collected as you browse our site. In order to consistently improve our online activities, we use cookies,track email open rates and periodically analyze our web traffic. This information helps us improve the quality of the site and enhance our online outreach efforts.

Information on children’s privacy.

We believe every precaution must be taken to protect children online. BashirWatch does not knowingly ask children 13 and under for any information. Visitors who are 13 or under should ask a parent or legal guardian for assistance when using BashirWatch and should not submit any personally identifiable information.

Links to other web sites.

BashirWatch provides links to third party web sites, and other web sites may link to our web site. BashirWatch does not endorse, nor is it responsible for the content of any third-party web sites we may list on BashirWatch. Sites that are linked to our site may have different policies; please review the privacy policy notices on those sites for details.